id: T003
name: Feature Gap Analysis - Core Trio
status: complete
created: 2025-12-08
completed: 2025-12-08
owner: peerB
goal: Identify and document gaps between specifications and implementation

description: |
  Compare specs to implementation for chainfire, flaredb, and iam.
  Produce a prioritized list of missing/incomplete features per component.
  This informs whether we can move to "Next" phase or need stabilization work.

acceptance:
  - Gap report for each of chainfire, flaredb, iam
  - Priority ranking (P0=critical, P1=important, P2=nice-to-have)
  - Estimate of implementation complexity (small/medium/large)

results:
  summary: |
    67% implementation coverage across 3 components.
    6 P0 blockers, 14 P1 gaps, 6 P2 gaps.
    Total effort: 7-10 person-weeks.
  p0_blockers:
    - FlareDB persistent Raft storage (data loss on restart)
    - Chainfire lease service (etcd compatibility)
    - Chainfire read consistency
    - Chainfire range in transactions
    - IAM health endpoints
    - IAM metrics

steps:
  - step: S1
    action: Audit chainfire gaps
    status: complete
    output: chainfire-gaps.md
    result: 62.5% impl, 3 P0, 5 P1

  - step: S2
    action: Audit flaredb gaps
    status: complete
    output: flaredb-gaps.md
    result: 54.5% impl, 1 P0 (critical - data loss), 5 P1

  - step: S3
    action: Audit iam gaps
    status: complete
    output: iam-gaps.md
    result: 84% impl, 2 P0, 4 P1

  - step: S4
    action: Consolidate priority report
    status: complete
    output: T003-report.md
    result: Consolidated with recommendations

notes: |
  Completed 2025-12-08 05:30.
  Awaiting PeerA review for strategic decision:
  - (A) Sequential: Address P0s first (2-3 weeks), then PlasmaVMC
  - (B) Parallel: Start PlasmaVMC while completing IAM P0s (3 days)
  FlareDB persistence is the critical blocker.